Name:............................................… Question: ......................… First Marker: ................................
Overall
Class: ...............................… Mark:
............................…
Moderator:
……………………….. Mark: …………………… Agreed Mark: …………………….
Organisation
Strong introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Introduction
vague or absent
Clear progression of argument . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . Points made at random or repeated
unnecessarily
Firm conclusion based on arguments . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . Conclusion absent or unclear
presented
Grasp of issues
Issues understood in detail . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . Failure to grasp essential details
Broader issues grasped and . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . Broader
context absent
presented
Analysis
Key issues clearly identified . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . issues not made clear
Coherent and convincing argument .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . implausible, incoherent or muddled
Expression
Clear, well-formed sentences . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . Sentence structure muddled
Correct and effective use of words .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . Words and concepts used
and concepts inaccurately
Use of sources
Sources assimilated, well-used . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . Reliant on undigested source
and adequately acknowledged material,
poorly acknowledged
Good bibliography, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . poor
bibliography,
references complete references
incomplete or absent
Comments: